Luke versus Allah
Luke 2:1-5: states that Mary was with Joseph in Bethlehem, 'to be taxed with Mary, his espoused wife being great with child.'
Question: Why did he take Mary there? Because he, not she was of the house and lineage of David!
Quran 19: 23-33: states that Mary was in a remote place where there was a stream and palm tree when the child-pains came on her. The individual who was with her was (a) a Prophet and (b) he who was given the Book. Joseph was neither (a) nor (b).
To Muslims: Who would you believe? Luke or Allah? Even Matthew, Mark and John discredited the account of Luke! And Allah completely ignored Joseph's alleged relationship with Mary! Where is Joseph, the carpenter, mentioned in the Qur'an?
The truth: John was foot to foot in attendance upon Mary from the moment Jesus was conceived unto his birth.
John: He was of the house and lineage of David. He had to 'pave the way'. The mussidique of Allah's kalimat. ( The criterion by which the true claimant is identified. In other words, the fulfillment of a Promise from God.)
Joseph: Not a mention of him in the Qur'an or in the Old Testament. He was non-existent, a non-entity. Invented to fill the gap to prove Jesus' link to David. To enlighten the mystery of Joseph, the Bible cannot even agree on who was the Father of Joseph. Matthew 1:16 states
1:16 And Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
While Luke 3:23 states:
3:23 And Jesus himself began to be about thirty years of age, being (as was supposed) the son of Joseph, which was the son of Heli,
Jesus: He was the Messiah, definitely. Christians and Muslims believe him as such. As the Messiah he can be neither God's Son nor fatherless. By root, seed and blood the Messiah is linked to David - as described in the Old and New Testaments. Joseph is therefore the counterfeit.